[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/doscmd intff.c
- To: Søren Schmidt <sos@xxxxxxxxxxx>, cvs-committers@xxxxxxxxxxx, cvs-all@xxxxxxxxxxx, cvs-usrbin@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/doscmd intff.c
- From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 16:19:34 +0200
- In-reply-to: <199807021407.HAA05486@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Søren Schmidt on Thu, Jul 02, 1998 at 07:07:33AM -0700
- References: <199807021407.HAA05486@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-cvs-usrbin@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, Jul 02, 1998 at 07:07:33AM -0700, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> sos 1998/07/02 07:07:32 PDT
> Modified files:
> usr.bin/doscmd intff.c
> Add missing ')'..
> Doesn't anybody TEST code before committing....
> This is the X'th time these laste couble of days...
Several of these has been problems with LKMs. The problem is that we
don't honour dependencies properly, and the LKMs is built at the wrong
point (they should IMO just be the kernel object files).
Forgetting the LKMs come pretty naturally if you don't do a buildworld
for each kernel change (and many people don't - I've been one of
themw). It is somewhat like you probably wouldn't do a buildworld for
a manpage change...