Re: JBoss 4.0.* does not build (sometimes?)

To: freebsd-java@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: JBoss 4.0.* does not build (sometimes?)
From: Alex Kiesel <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:28:46 +0100
Cc:
Delivered-to: freebsd-java@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1137336063.713.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>, <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>, <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1137336063.713.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 15:41 +0100, Alex Kiesel wrote:
> I do suspect, it's got nothing todo with the FreeBSD versions, but more
> with something else, I do not see. Both machines only have this single
> jdk installed - nothing else.

It seems that suspiction was correct. I noticed that one the failing
machine, the port axis-1.2.2 was installed while on the other it wasn't.

After removal of the port, the compile went through. JBoss seems to ship
an own version of Axis which was behind the port's version in the
classpath probably.

So, I wonder if java/jboss4 should list axis-* as CONFLICTS?

Regards,
-Alex

Follow-Ups:
- Re: JBoss 4.0.* does not build (sometimes?)
  - From: Panagiotis Astithas

References:
- JBoss 4.0.* does not build (sometimes?)
  - From: Alex Kiesel

Prev by Date: JBoss 4.0.* does not build (sometimes?)
Next by Date: Re: Performance patch for jdk1.5.0/amd64
Previous by thread: JBoss 4.0.* does not build (sometimes?)
Next by thread: Re: JBoss 4.0.* does not build (sometimes?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread