[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: xorg-libraries failure

On Tuesday 31 January 2006 06:11, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 03:02:45PM +1100, Sam Lawrance wrote:
> > On 31/01/2006, at 2:56 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 02:49:18PM +1100, Sam Lawrance wrote:
> > >>WRT this log:
> > >>
> > >>	http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.
> > >>6.2005101118/xorg-libraries-6.9.0.log
> > >>
> > >>All the leftover directories are ones that were removed from etc/
> > >>mtree/BSD.x11-4.dist 7 months ago:
> > >
> > >Hmm, that's interesting.  Perhaps the change was never MFCed?  That
> > >would certainly explain why everything is failing on < 7.0.
> >
> > RELENG_[456] all have the changes.  They were merged straight away.
> OK, fontconfig was built with
> ports/x11-servers/xorg-server/files/BSD.x11-xorg.dist as the mtree
> spec..it was not rebuilt after the X.org import because no version or
> dependency list changed.  Perhaps it should be portrevision bumped
> since it's effectively a plist change..

It got bumped for expat library upgrade about 8 hours ago so that should do 

> although the mtree spec is also 
> going to be recorded in every other old X package too.  Why do we
> record a copy of +MTREE_FILE in the package anyway?

They tend to depend at least on xorg-libraries so they should be rebuild. I 
didn't think of fontconfig though.

> Somehow the imake-6 package also has this mtree spec, although I have
> no idea how since the change to the mtree file was coincident with the
> 6.9 upgrade.  Hmm, maybe I forgot to change the buildscript mtree file
> straight away and it used it from there.

But ports/x11-servers/xorg-server/files/BSD.x11-xorg.dist was removed  at the 
same commit, shouldn't imake-6 fail if it was going to use it?