On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 02:02:46AM +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > On Wednesday 01 February 2006 00:04, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 11:37:27PM +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > > On Tuesday 31 January 2006 22:36, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > OK, next problem..a bunch of ports are leaving behind the following > > > > directory. Should it be the port's responsibility to clean it up? > > > > > > Probably not of each one of these. Imake uses this directory and it > > > cleans it up. Also a couple of ports use it to install their imake > > > configs. In this case it would probably be x11-toolkits/xview, not > > > games/imaze itself. I'll check if adding it to xview plist fixes this. > > > > That looks reasonable, all the other affected ports depend on xview. > > The only thing to check is that xview is the package that created this > > directory also (e.g. installed a file inside it and implicitly created > > the directory in the case when it was not already present). > > I can't seem to get this error on tinderbox so I'm not sure this would fix it. > The change to xview plist is necessary though. I'm also a bit puzzled why > pointyhat didn't complain on test run. It's only hilighted by a very recent change I made to pointyhat, which is why both of the above are happening. > Should revision of xview be bumped for > addition of this directory in plist or can you somehow test before if this is > really the culprit? The change I had in mind is: I can test that, and it should have a revision bump since the package needs to be rebuilt in order for other packages to be fixed. Thanks, Kris
Attachment:
pgp7MG5jdkEUn.pgp
Description: PGP signature