[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ports-i386@xxxxxxxxxxx: imaze-xview-1.4 failed on i386 7]

On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 02:02:46AM +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 00:04, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 11:37:27PM +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 31 January 2006 22:36, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > OK, next problem..a bunch of ports are leaving behind the following
> > > > directory.  Should it be the port's responsibility to clean it up?
> > >
> > > Probably not of each one of these. Imake uses this directory and it
> > > cleans it up. Also a couple of ports use it to install their imake
> > > configs. In this case it would probably be x11-toolkits/xview, not
> > > games/imaze itself. I'll check if adding it to xview plist fixes this.
> >
> > That looks reasonable, all the other affected ports depend on xview.
> > The only thing to check is that xview is the package that created this
> > directory also (e.g. installed a file inside it and implicitly created
> > the directory in the case when it was not already present).
> I can't seem to get this error on tinderbox so I'm not sure this would fix it. 
> The change to xview plist is necessary though. I'm also a bit puzzled why 
> pointyhat didn't complain on test run.

It's only hilighted by a very recent change I made to pointyhat, which
is why both of the above are happening.

> Should revision of xview be bumped for 
> addition of this directory in plist or can you somehow test before if this is 
> really the culprit? The change I had in mind is:

I can test that, and it should have a revision bump since the package
needs to be rebuilt in order for other packages to be fixed.


Attachment: pgp7MG5jdkEUn.pgp
Description: PGP signature