[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Users of netatm/HARP
Harti Brandt wrote:
> the netatm directory containing the HARP code is basically unmaintained.
> Giving that most of the usual ATM stuff can now also be done with NgATM it
> is intented to remove netatm at one point in HEAD. The one missing piece
> in NgATM that netatm does is CLIP over signalled connections. I have some
> code for this that worked with earlier versions of NgATM, but I doubt that
> I have enough time in the next view months to actual bring this into
> So the question is: what would break for whom if we remove netatm?
ForeIP and SPANS? :)
But I don't think supporting these is worth the trouble and IMHO harp
can be retired now...
Dean C. Strik Eindhoven University of Technology
dean@xxxxxxxx | dean@xxxxxxxxxx | http://www.ipnet6.org/
"This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli