[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: afs?
At 12:57 PM -0500 1/7/03, E. Scott Larsen wrote:
Thanks to everyone's replies. Summary of my expierence so far:
Next came the reply suggesting that arla would surely work,
regardless of whether the port is broken or not. I went to arla's
web page and found a freebsd 4.6 and higher binary package (I'm
running 4.7-STABLE).
For people running current, that probably won't work.
For people running current, note that Love <lha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
recently responded to a thread on the freebsd-current mailing
list, where he is working on updates to arla for 5.0. The thread
is under the subject:
Re: ARLA 0.35.11 on FreeBSD 5.0-RC1
and was around December 17th - 18th
In one of his messages, he noted:
a Known problem on fbsd5.0RC1 is that arla uses the pioctl
syscall (339) but the built in libkafs in freebsd uses 210
(lkmsys). [You should] set AFS_SYSCALL=339 in your environment
(including arlad's).
ftp://ftp.stacken.kth.se/pub/arla/snap/arla-0.36pre5.tar.gz
MD5 (arla-0.36pre5.tar.gz) = 48a9955df0e69fac5a323a48b29aec66
(untested) binaries releases for random platforms might be found in
ftp://ftp.stacken.kth.se/pub/arla/binaries/0.36pre5
Feedback is appreciated.
I haven't had a chance to do anything with that, as I've been busy
shoveling snow for my christmas/new-years break...
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Senior Systems Programmer or gad@xxxxxxxxxxx
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@xxxxxxx
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe freebsd-afs" in the body of the message